Difference between revisions of "PartKeepr on Raspberry Pi"
From PartKeepr Wiki
(Created page with "User:Felicitus finally received his Raspberry Pi. Experiences: * Initial test without APC was very slow, resulted in request timeouts * The kernel crashed twice while ins...") |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* The kernel crashed twice while installing, so probably there are a few kernel bugs to iron out (not a PartKeepr fault) | * The kernel crashed twice while installing, so probably there are a few kernel bugs to iron out (not a PartKeepr fault) | ||
* Second test with APC installed resulted in much better response times, but still very slow. | * Second test with APC installed resulted in much better response times, but still very slow. | ||
+ | * Memory usage is OK (100M/200M used) | ||
I will take the opportunity to use the Raspberry Pi to optimize PartKeepr, hopefully I can make it more speedy. | I will take the opportunity to use the Raspberry Pi to optimize PartKeepr, hopefully I can make it more speedy. |
Revision as of 18:24, 11 June 2012
User:Felicitus finally received his Raspberry Pi.
Experiences:
- Initial test without APC was very slow, resulted in request timeouts
- The kernel crashed twice while installing, so probably there are a few kernel bugs to iron out (not a PartKeepr fault)
- Second test with APC installed resulted in much better response times, but still very slow.
- Memory usage is OK (100M/200M used)
I will take the opportunity to use the Raspberry Pi to optimize PartKeepr, hopefully I can make it more speedy.